A case for faith
Sharon Neely
However, I was troubled and saddened by the assumptions Malina made about faith and its role in people's lives. And while I'm going to use my own experiences and thoughts as an active believer in God to, in turn, refute Malina's claims, I write in full confidence and awareness that there are many, many others out there who share my views.
My first concern was the definition of faith used by Malina. Regardless of the fact that I think it's almost laughably absurd to use an atheist's definition of faith, I furthermore do not agree that faith is "belief without, or in spite of, reason." I'm sorry that that is what some people's view of faith is.
I see proof for my faith everyday, in what I'm assuming most atheists put their "faith" in: science. Yes, I believe in God and evolution and global warming and that the earth is 4.5 billion years old, and I see God behind it all. Scientists have discovered the quark, but we still aren't sure why they stick together to make atoms. We've delved into the brain, found the dendrite and the axon, but still haven't figured out how memory really works.
But my answer to that is God. What else could have made such a beautiful and complex and spectacular universe? And I'm not alone; even prominent scientists, in the course of their reasoned studies, have seen the brilliance of the stars in the galaxy and have come away knowing there must be a Creator behind it.
I see the Creator in the beauty of the leaves turning red and the ability of a penguin to hear the call of her child amongst thousands. I feel as if I'm communing with the Divine each time I learn a new law of physics or see how a math problem works. Reason and science and thought lead me to God. I don't find that the "available evidence" for God is lacking - rather, I believe that it's so abundant that you can almost be numbed by it.
My second - but no less worrisome - concern is the claim that theism is "founded on the basis of the acceptance of certain unflinching truths." My experience is that faith and belief are not that simple in the slightest.
Faith is about going on a journey, it's about struggle and it's about wrestling with what happens in the world head on. It's about asking questions and not agreeing with the answers and continuing to search. Sometimes it is about doubting and leaving your faith until you come back realizing that you want to believe. Only then is your faith stronger.
So you might not think it, but faithful people need to be "verifying and integrating new data" into our schemas as much as the scientist - because faith provides answers that are hardly "static." Different faiths each have their own sects, which all have their own theologians saying different things.
Part of the journey is finding what the truth is for yourself. It seems to me that atheism, in fact, provides the static answer, while faith makes you deal with the fact that God does exist, and, despite this, the world is how it is.
So when I read Malina's article, I was bothered by it. I like to think that I see the world "as it exists" - don't we all? But my faith never hinders my belief in that. Rather, my faith inspires me to respond to the state the world is in. My faith gives me a purpose in life, and assures me that there is a God who created me and every other person in the world - and loves us all the same.
It isn't that I hide behind a dogma or have been brainwashed by cult leaders. Though unfortunately there are people out there who pervert organized religion into something horrendous and politicians who give belief a bad name, you'll find that most believers are regular people who have found a connection with something greater than themselves.
Sharon Neely is a freshman who has not yet declared a major.

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
BlackSun
posted 11/14/07 @ 1:13 PM EST
It would be nice to think freshman such as Sharon Neely would go through college and come out 4 years later well-educated as to the naivete of their foolish youth. (Continued…)
Sam Kounaves
posted 11/14/07 @ 4:37 PM EST
This Op-Ed reminded me of the quote by Douglas Adams:
"God used to be the best explanation we had, but now we've got vastly better ones. God is no longer an explanation of anything, but has instead become something that that would itself need an insurmountable amount of explaining. (Continued…)
R Sanchez
posted 11/14/07 @ 6:16 PM EST
Ms. Neely says that "God" is her answer to the mystery of memory or the complexity of the universe. I think she will find that such an answer will receive a very poor mark on a psychology exam, or a physics exam, or any exam in the natural sciences (or mathematical sciences, for that matter, since she mentions math as well. (Continued…)
Nina Lee
Nina Lee
posted 11/14/07 @ 6:16 PM EST
Neely, you reject Malina's definition of "faith", and then you fail to provide an alternative definition. Since you say, "Different faiths each have their own sects, which all have their own theologians saying different things", you seem to use "faith" as a synonym for 'religion'. (Continued…)
Yolanda
posted 11/15/07 @ 9:38 AM EST
Great Article!! You said everything so well!
John Howard
posted 11/15/07 @ 12:38 PM EST
Word-gaming the word "faith" to declare that now it means noticing beauty or struggling with life's adventure or asking questions and doing research or having a purpose, or facing facts, is mighty poetic, but not at all valid. (Continued…)
John Reading
posted 11/15/07 @ 1:00 PM EST
It certainly is an example of faith to believe in anthropogentic global warming. Faith means sticking something in your head without having a good reason. (Continued…)
Len
posted 11/15/07 @ 11:44 PM EST
Sharon, whom do you see in the evil of Ebola? Why create such a thing for the ones you love all the same? Why put someone you love through the terror of it?
Is this where you play the 'God works in strange ways' card?
It's your God's universe, no?
Post a Comment